intellectual vanities… about close to everything

Understanding Smooth Eye Pursuit: The Incredible Targeting System Of Human Vision

leave a comment »

Source: University of Pennsylvania
Date: July 5, 2007

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have shed new light on how the brain and eye team up to spot an object in motion and follow it, a classic question of human motor control.  The study shows that two distinctly different ways of seeing motion are used – one to catch up to a moving object with our eyes, a second to lock on and examine it.

Eye diagram. (Credit: National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health)

“Without the ability to lock our eyes onto a moving target, something called smooth pursuit, athletes cannot ‘keep their eye on the ball,’ and a person walking down the street cannot examine the facial expression or identity of a passerby,” said Jeremy Wilmer, postdoctoral fellow in the Department of Psychology in Penn’s School of Arts and Sciences and lead author of the study.  

Researchers found that volunteers showed a range of capabilities when it came to sensing and following motion, and the careful measurement of such differences produced novel insights into the workings of the smooth pursuit system.  

“Our automatic tendency is to assume you and I see the same baseball, or color, or face, but in fact our experiences can be quite different,” Wilmer said.  “The assumption of a common visual experience can backfire when we assume wrongly that the person next to us perceives the same flying projectile, or red hexagonal sign, or emotion that we do.”

Researchers explored the two ways of perceiving motion to see how each contributes to smooth pursuit.  The first, called low-level motion perception, is the sense one gets of disembodied motion before knowing what is moving.  The second, called high-level motion perception, is the ability to watch an object move through time and space after it has been recognized.  

Participants who were good at low-level motion perception caught up to a moving object with their eyes more easily.  A completely different set of volunteers exhibited skill at high-level motion perception and were much better at locking onto a moving target once their eyes caught up to it.  This result shows that distinct experiences of motion drive different stages of smooth pursuit.  

“Our experience of the world normally appears quite seamless,” Wilmer said, “but in fact our brain sees many aspects separately and knits them together into one experience of the world.”

The study result builds on research into how piecemeal processing in the brain leads to holistic experience and seamless behavior.  It also provides insight into a smooth pursuit system important for both social skills and sports.  The first in-depth study of how individuals differ from each other in their ability to sense and follow motion, this research sets the stage for future studies of genetic and environmental influences that shape conscious visual experience.  

Smooth pursuit ability is rare in the animal kingdom and only well developed in primates such as humans, and in praying mantises.  

“It could be,” Wilmer said, “that a penchant for high-level motion perception is essential for our incredibly handy ability to lock onto and examine moving objects.”

Wilmer and Ken Nakayama, professor of psychology at Harvard University, reported their findings in the current issue of Neuron.

The research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Eye Institute.

Neuron. 2007 Jun 21;54(6):987-1000.

Two distinct visual motion mechanisms for smooth pursuit: evidence from individual differences.Wilmer JB, Nakayama K.

Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Smooth-pursuit eye velocity to a moving target is more accurate after an initial catch-up saccade than before, an enhancement that is poorly understood. We present an individual-differences-based method for identifying mechanisms underlying a physiological response and use it to test whether visual motion signals driving pursuit differ pre- and postsaccade. Correlating moment-to-moment measurements of pursuit over time with two psychophysical measures of speed estimation during fixation, we find two independent associations across individuals. Presaccadic pursuit acceleration is predicted by the precision of low-level (motion-energy-based) speed estimation, and postsaccadic pursuit precision is predicted by the precision of high-level (position-tracking) speed estimation. These results provide evidence that a low-level motion signal influences presaccadic acceleration and an independent high-level motion signal influences postsaccadic precision, thus presenting a plausible mechanism for postsaccadic enhancement of pursuit.

PMID: 17582337 [PubMed – in process]


Written by huehueteotl

July 6, 2007 at 10:10 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: