intellectual vanities… about close to everything

Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse Fact Or Fiction?

with 2 comments

Discriminating Fact From Fiction In Recovered Memories Of Childhood Sexual Abuse

A decade or so ago, a spate of high profile legal cases arose in which people were accused, and often convicted, on the basis of “recovered memories.” These memories, usually recollections of childhood abuse, arose years after the incident occurred and often during intensive psychotherapy.

So how accurate are recovered memories? The answer is not so clear. In fact, this question has lead to one of the most contentious issues in the fields of psychology and psychiatry.

Elke Geraerts, a postdoc of psychology at Harvard University and Maastricht University, the Netherlands, hoped to settle some of the controversy by enacting a large-scale research study examining the validity of such memories.

Recovered memories are inherently tricky to validate for several reasons, most notably because the people who hold them are thoroughly convinced of their authenticity. Therefore, to maneuver around this obstacle Geraerts and her colleagues attempted to corroborate the memories through outside sources.

The researchers recruited a sample of people who reported being sexually abused as children and divided them based on how they remembered the event. The memories were categorized as either “spontaneously recovered” (the participant had forgotten and then spontaneously recalled the abuse outside of therapy, without any prompting), “recovered in therapy” (the participant had recovered the abuse during therapy, prompted by suggestion) or “continuous” (the participant had always been able to recall the abuse).

Once all of the information was gathered, interviewers, who were blind to the type of abuse memory, queried other people who could confirm or refute the abuse events (other people who heard about the abuse soon after it occurred, other people who reported also having been abused by the same perpetrator, or people who admitted having committed the abuse him/herself).

The results, published in the July issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, showed that, overall, spontaneously recovered memories were corroborated about as often (37% of the time) as continuous memories (45%). Thus, abuse memories that are spontaneously recovered may indeed be just as accurate as memories that have persisted since the time the incident took place. Interestingly, memories that were recovered in therapy could not be corroborated at all.

Although the absence of confirmation that the abuse had happened does not imply that the memory is false, the findings of this study show that memories recovered in therapy should be viewed with a cautious eye, as “the therapy context often involves an explicit effort to unearth forgotten memories and thereby raises the opportunity for suggestion.”

The Reality of Recovered Memories: Corroborating Continuous and Discontinuous Memories of Childhood Sexual Abuse
Elke Geraerts, Jonathan W. Schooler, Harald Merckelbach, Marko Jelicic, Beatrijs J.A. Hauer, and Zara Ambadar
Psychological Science, Volume 18, Number 7· July 2007


Written by huehueteotl

June 18, 2007 at 12:02 pm

Posted in Psychology

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. … a topic close to my heart. I am a survivor of several rapes and sexual assaults. (ages 7, 17,18,19,21) While there are elements of each that I’ve always recalled (continuous), I was disturbed by what I saw happening in therapy and opted not to disclose the rape at age 7 to my therapist before stopping therapy.

    My therapist was not trying to suggest memories, but was very persistent at pressing for details. It’s difficult, I suppose, to know how to respond when someone says, “I can’t remember.” Are they embarrassed/ashamed to say what they do remember or can they truely not remember? I do believe my desire to please led me to ‘create’ details that were not actually remembered … or if not a desire to please, maybe just the most efficient way of making the question stop. It’s hard to know:-)

    I hope therapists are learning to be accepting of incomplete memories. Isn’t that how we remember everything, really? I mean, you might remember quite well a family vacation when you were 7, but you’re not going to remember every detail.

    Laurel Farrell

    June 20, 2007 at 2:45 pm

  2. thank you so much for the comment. i strongly agree with you. as a rule of thumb in my work, i never “correct” nor try to provoke. what the client discloses is what he decided to disclose. and i think this acceptance is the grounds of trustfully working together. besides, there is no need to get into any detail in order to live a memory, as you said. a recollection of any sort, good or bad one, is living of keys that lead to the experience as whole. that is, why human memory is so much superior to cybernetical data storage.


    June 20, 2007 at 10:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: